Monday, August 16, 2010

Curiouser and Curiouser

 

Following my previous post, I received email tips from a few people regarding the identity of the Amber who gave birth on April 18, 2008 at Alaska Regional. Although those leads didn’t pan out, I was able to identify the correct Amber. The last name of the father is still unknown. I was hoping to hear from an acquaintance of Amber just to verify that the picture is actually of her son but I am 99.9% sure that it is. What I can’t fathom is why that baby looks identical to Tripp.

I also discovered that Amber had a daughter who was killed in an automobile accident in 2003 at the age of 18 months. This child also bears a remarkable resemblance to Tripp, in my opinion. The shape of the faces, noses, mouths and ears are all so much alike. I can’t believe that the children pictured are unrelated.

babygirl  bristol_levi_usweekly

You can click the picture of the little girl to see her obituary.

Here is the picture of the baby born April 18, 2008 again with a different picture of Tripp for comparison. Click the picture on the left to see the birth announcement for Jeremiah Alan.

h22-3127-med   3tripp

Click here to go to Amber’s MySpace page.

Click here to go to Amber’s Facebook page.

What does all of this mean? I don’t know but I do believe something is fishy. What are the odds that by some coincidence two of Amber’s children would look so much like Tripp Johnston if they are unrelated? It would be interesting to see if her other two children also look like Tripp.

What are the odds that if Levi fathered a baby that was born on April 18, 2008 it has nothing to do with babygate?

My head is spinning, wondering how many more lookalike babies there are.

 

Blade

37 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, if Amber is the mother, and this is her child, and I assume she is still the mother of this child, then what does this have to do with anything?

I just think you're barking up the wrong tree; LOTS of babies look similar.

I'm not trying to be contrary, because I do think Trig is not Sarah Palin's biological son, and I think Bristol was pregnant in 2007. I also thought something was hinky with the whole way Tripp's birth was announced, but if Sadie says she saw newborn Tripp in the hospital in December, 2008, I will believe her.

I personally don't think that baby looks like baby Tripp. Have you seen the photos of premie-looking Tripp? He has that cute little up-turned nose even as a newborn, and this baby you are showing doesn't.

I think this whole thing can be chalked up to "coincidence".

Ginger said...

Mercede also asked her friend..."Heather"...to make a comment on her blog that she was in the room next to Bristol when she gave birth to Tripp.

Heather ended the comment like this..."(Sadie idk how much you want me to say so I'll leave it at that.)

Anonymous said...

I thought this blog was to 'discuss Sarah Palin's scandals, particularly the possible pretend pregnancy'.

What does Sarah Palin's daughter's, ex-boyfriends, (maybe) old ex-girlfriend who suffered the lost of a child in 2003 and gave birth to another recent child have to do with Palin?

I am in no way a fan of Palin but posting a picture of a deceased child and trying to tie that baby to the one born to its mother and a 'maybe' possible Levi Johnson connection is not right.

I got a sick feeling reading this post and there should be times, some stories, rumors, gossip, shouldn't be crossed. The death of a child and the wondering of the father, is one of them. Rest in Peace.

I agree with Anon 10:17, .... chalk up to 'coincidence'.

GinaM said...

How bout this comment posted on Amber's Myspace:

Man you are such a liar. You go out on a date with a low life like Levi but you can't come and see me. But really I'm glad cause it shows me how sick you make me inside to see a girl like you let people run your life.. Good bye and there ain't no fare well for you cause you'll always be living as a Peterson/felger your not worthy enough for anyone and you'll always be left alone and un loved by a real hearted man. You deserve everything you get coming to you. Faith is not by your side but at least your family will be... Good riddens and don't bother me ever again I hope when you here any song that reminds you ov me it makes you so happy to think about me only to realize how bad you fucked up. Gosh you make me sick to my stomach.. Fuck you

Posted Mar 12 2010 11:42 PM

Who is Teddy Havnen?

truthrocks said...

I agree that Sarah Palin has perpetrated numerous hoaxes on the people of AK and the USA, and that she is not fit to hold political office, however, the use of images of innocent, and even deceased babies, who are, at best, tangential to the issue of exposing the truth of Sarah palin, is irresponsible and just plain unethical. Just my opinion. Otherwise I whole-heartedly support the intent of your blog!

Ginger said...

Since "Heidi1" asked about the e-mail from SOA, Benefits Div., I typed it on the last thread, if you care to read it.

It was..."Released to msnbc.com by the State of Alaska and presented by Crivella West."

Have a nice day...

Anonymous said...

That's a lot of babies, but not much spelling or grammar. What third world nation is this?

Anonymous said...

Another blogger was threatened and had to shut down, just as she was analyzing photos of Bristol and some classic Palin shape-shifting. Her theory was that Bristol was NOT pg at all.

And then she was shut down.
If there was NO there, there, why would anyone care? I was pg 8 years ago and no blogger could find evidence that I wasn't!! So I wouldn't shut them down for trying. Why did they?

Anonymous said...

That photo is Tripp, I am convinced of that. And I think that this is all fair since we know that One Levi had a baby on April 18th and we have no proof that any other baby was born that day to any Palin, so this baby and this Amber are more pieces of the puzzle.

Anonymous said...

And about those emails: my experience is that I signed the birth cert in the hospital and it was sent to the county for me, I did nothing and my insurance company NEVER needed any proof from me, so why did they need proof from the Palins?

Anonymous said...

Could Todd be the father of Amber's children? That might explain the family resemblance.

Anonymous said...

Anon 7:48: something is up but Tripp looks exactly like Grandpa Chuck Heath, so it is that resemblance we are looking at. One of the Trigs looks like Levi to me, but Tripp is Chuck.

Anonymous said...

Amber's Myspace says she's 30? Wouldn't Levi have been a minor?

Blade said...

To All - I apologize if I have offended anyone by bringing the child who was killed into this. I was just struck by how she looked so much like Tripp. I thought long and hard before including it in my post. I just have a feeling that there is some connection to the Palin's and that by including that picture someone who knows something might see it and be able to tell us more.

Blade

Anonymous said...

To Aug. 17th @7:48

I believe as you do. Tripp. looks exactly like "chucky" Poor child.

Anonymous said...

There is something very strange about the angle of Tripp's arm in the magazine cover picture. Also, his legs look rather long for his stated age.

Anonymous said...

I saw the resemblance between the deceased child and Tripp before reading the post.

I disagree that these babies are tangential to the issue. The Palins have managed to obfuscate who gave birth to which baby when... as well as who fathered them. This blog is to address that, and I'm not seeing any badmouthing of Amber for her choices.

If the Palins had been even ordinarily honest, none of this would be needed.

Ivyfree

Anonymous said...

If Levi Johnston is the father of Tripp, I must say it was strange that he only had a sonogram/photo when he was confronted by the press in his new truck last year. Remember that?

Also, I do NOT see a resemblance between cute little Tripp and Chuck Heath. I do not see a resemblance between Tripp and the little girl above. I DO, however, see a possible resemblance between the newborn photo on the left and cute little baby photo of Tripp -maybe 4-6 months old there. I DO think that there are very valid questions to be raised about who, exactly, Tripp really is.

Anonymous said...

I think there is a close resemblance between Amber's baby and Tripp, plus there is close timing and location compared to the baby presented as Trig Palin. Ordinarily the resemblance and proximity would be of importance to very few, if any, people, and not worthy of a blog.

But the hoax of the Palin family, the deception(s) put on the entire US for the sake of political and financial personal ambition, is significant and meaningful to expose. As in any mystery, a lot of threads have to be followed to uncover the truth, and most threads will lead nowhere. They must be followed anyway to rule them out or to stumble across a new one. Blade's discovery of Amber's baby may lead to nothing, or it may lead to more new information about the Palin family lies. It's worthy to at least look at.

It isn't the Palin family dynamics and cheap drama that are important to us. What is important is the truth as it has impacted the political scene of the whole country. Sarah Palin is hurtful to our country with her divisive and hate-filled demagoguery; and the foundation of her strength has been the hoax surrounding Trig. It's the media's job to ferret out the truth, but the media is complicit. Our best chance at revealing the dishonesty - short of someone(s) coming forward with clear knowledge - is to follow leads such as this one and make enough noise to force action by mainstream media and legal eagles.

I don't think that Amber's little daughter, heartbreakingly lost, shows resemblance or relevance. I would hope for some sensitivity to Amber's pain and for her privacy. I also hope that Amber understands that information and hunches that may expose the terrible damage to this country being done by Sarah Palin and her handlers, are important to at least consider. If they are not relevant, I would think that could be easily proved with documents. If this is a poor lead, it could be stopped immediately, and sleuthing energy applied elsewhere. In the meantime, I commend Blade's investigative efforts to come up with what could be revealing information.

The whole country needs to know the truth about the Palin lies. The deception about Trig's birth - Sarah's supposed pregnancy - has had a large chain of reaction on our entire political scene, to the detriment of all of us, including her fans. Only the truth, good or bad, can remove the smoke and mirrors. And to expose the truth, leads have to be followed.

Anonymous said...

I think that baby in the blue with the yellow dinos is Tripp - the resemblance is beyond remarkable. And if that photo was posted back in April 2008 then something is really fishy. I don't think that baby is a brother or relative - I think it is Tripp. And that means that there is no Tripp born in December of 2008 as speculated about by Audrey in those important posts.

The next question is was this baby really born to Bristol and Levi? Did they hide him until they could fudge his age and pass him off as a baby born in December? Did they use another baby for the appearance on Greta and the Today Show?

It is possible that something really twisted is going on here.

Anonymous said...

This could explain Levi's trepidation about claiming Tripp for shared custody.

Anonymous said...

To anyone who wonders if Tripp looks like Chuck...go here:

http://sarahpalintruthsquad.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/chuckheath.jpg

Gles said...

Anon 6:15AM It is quite possible that the state benefits coordinator knew Sarah, heard the rumors about a fake pregnancy and possibly alerted the insurance company which requested a birth certificate. I am sure the insurance company has fraud investigators in employment.

I don't think we are ever going to know if adjustments were made to her insurance bill... kinda like the airfare for her kids to fly on Alaskan taxpayers dime. I am thinking back to the letter from CBJ re Palin having 5 live births and no questions asked.

Ginger said...

To: Gless

That's a very good analysis of why they asked for a birth certificate.

And, you are right, we will never know if adjustments were made to her insurance bill. Maybe she does have that b/c and sent it in. The Bureau of Vital Statistics, I think, is in Juneau. She's not very popular there. You would think someone would have access to this information.

It seems everyone knows she faked a pg (even the legislature) but will not come forward and talk. Have they seen the birth certificate?

Good question, huh?

Anonymous said...

CBJ didn't write that letter. It was a forgery by Palin.

Agnes said...

How are these pictures posted on hospital websites? Does a hospital employee take pictures of the babies, then post them if the parents agree? Or do the parents have to donate the pictures from their private collections? I just wonder if Bristol and Amber could have had babies on the same day. Bristol's was supposed to be kept secret, but an employee mixed up the pictures, since both fathers were named Levi? I know this is far fetched. I'm just speculating. Any thoughts?

Ginger said...

To: Anon 10:08 AM

There is a People Mag. article in the July 26, 2010, issue. It is about Bristol and Tripp. At this time, he was 18 months old. There is a caption to the left of one picture that reads:

"He's going through the terrible twos," Palin says. "He's so bossy right now!"

Although this is insignificant, don't the "terrible twos" start after a child turns two years old?

Just askin'...

Blade said...

Hi Agnes - I was wondering the same thing myself about the pictures being mixed up. I am pretty sure that the hospital takes those pics.

Ginger - I have a granddaughter who is 6 weeks older than Tripp. Her parents say she's going through the terrible two's as well. That said I can't dismiss the possibilty that Tripp may be older than stated as strange as that seems. To me in the recent pictures he seems bigger than he should be for his stated age.

Blade

Gles said...

Anon 3:44PM I can't remember if CBJ signed the letter or not. One thing that has occurred to me re the "live births". What if one of the babies was born alive then died shortly thereafter. I don't like saying things like this but it happens.
I guess I need to find the letter and re-read it!

Anonymous said...

Blade - I agree with you about Tripp's size. He does seem a little bigger than one would expect for his stated age. I was expecially surprised to see him in that May'09 interview with BP and Mat Lauer (?) where Tripp was sleeping on BP's lap. He looked so long for a baby who was supposed to be barely 5 months old.

Anonymous said...

What if Tripp was born at the same time as Amber's baby and the pictures were switched? If Amber's baby --let's just say it was Ruffles -- was thought to be DS and Sarah's ambitions led her to adopt it, and then it turned out to be FAS (or died), they then had to find a DS baby (or two). That could account for all the babies, and make sense of all the pictures.

Agnes said...

Anonymous at 8:16 - That's a good try, but it's not likely that Amber would have given her baby up for adoption, and there would still be Bristol's baby to be accounted for. Ruffles doesn't resemble any of these other babies. This story has too.many.babies.

Anonymous said...

Let's try again -- I really wasn't very clear. If Amber's baby was expected to be DS (and perhaps there was some money involved), perhaps a woman in not-terrific (I don't know) financial circumstances might be willing, for the sake of the child. Bristol's baby might have been raised by Amber until December as part of the deal -- or originally it was to have been a switch, until Sarah needed to cover for all the rumors. Ruffles would either be borrowed for photo-ops or Amber's FAS-not-DS-baby-who-had-to-be-exchanged. If you believe, as I do, that the Amber-Levi photo baby is Tripp, then there are at least three babies involved: Amber-Levi, Ruffles, and Trig Of Various Ears. But I think this covers all but Trig, who is either borrowed for photo ops or might have been obtained through Franklin Graham or perhaps their church up there.

Anonymous said...

Have you seen the Levi Johnston for Mayor video? Towards the end of the video, when it states that Levi is a "father," it shows TWO pictures - one of Levi with Tripp and the one taken at the convention where Levi and Bristol and holding Trig.

That picture would not have been included in the video by accident. One would assume they would have shown pictures only of Tripp. Is Levi ready to tell the world he is Trig's father?? Or is he just trying to piss off Sarah?

Anonymous said...

DNA!! If all the knowledge I get from TV shows is correct, all we need to do is get an old coke can of sarah's and a lock of hair from the baby and send it off to the lab.

The coke can is possible, maybe the hair will be a bit difficult, but this baby has to go to a barber at some point....

Ginger said...

Blade - After your comment, I went back and looked at the pictures of Tripp in People Mag. He is "big" for a 16-1/2 mo. old child. The mag. said he was 18 mo.'s. But, at the end of July, he was 17 mo.'s. And the pictures had to be taken in early July to make an issue on July 26.

None of the pictures showed him standing up. He was always sitting or laying on a bed. It would be very interesting, Blade, if you could get a picture of another 16/17 month old boy and do a comparison. Like another commenter said, he sure has long legs.

BTW, to me, Tripp looks like he could be of Scandinavian descent.

Anonymous said...

Anon 6:24: Interesting. I would imagine that Levi saw this before it was finally approved. Did he not notice? If he did notice and let it slide....