Thursday, September 30, 2010

Palins-CBJ Signature Comparison

 

I made another signature composite. This one includes the CBJ signature from the letter along with signatures of Sarah and Todd from public records available from the Alaska DNR Office of the Recorder.

There are three sets of signatures of Sarah and Todd. The middle right center is from a document only signed by Todd.

 

 

 

Icbj-palins -comp

To me, it looks like there may be similarities between the “a”  in the  first “Sarah” and the “a” in Baldwin but I’m not sure. Then look at the “h” in Johnson and the “h” in the “Sarah” below Todd’s signature on the right. Both of those “h” ‘s look like a cursive “l” connected to a cursive “i”, in my opinion.

Another thing I noticed about the Palin’s signatures is the possibility that one of them signed the other’s name on the documents I obtained the signatures from. Each set looks like the signatures could have been done by the same person, to my eye. So considering all the Palins signatures, including the middle right signature of Todd alone, do you think one of them signed the CBJ letter and if so which one?

One more thing before I close. I received an email suggesting having a handwriting expert do an analysis. I am on a fixed income so it’s not within my budget. The reader who emailed me suggested maybe starting a fund to have the analysis done. If you reply to this post please indicate whether you think I should add a PayPal button for donations to a fund for that purpose. This expert charges $295 for a verbal opinion and $590 for an official written letter of opinion.

http://www.expertdocumentexaminer.com/

Please express your opinions freely and I look forward to your responses.

bladecatz@mail.com

Blade

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

The Real Reason For The CBJ Letter And Why It Didn’t Serve Its Purpose (UPDATE)

 

I have updated the signature composite to include another sample of CBJ’s handwriting also from the public records available from the Alaska DNR Office of the Recorder. 

____________________________________________________________________

The purpose of the letter purportedly from CBJ on November 3, 2008 was not to report on the health of Sarah Palin. It is blatantly obvious that the letter’s aim was to prove that Sarah Palin gave birth to Trig Palin on April 18, 2008. However, it failed miserably and only raised more questions.

The letter begins with CBJ blowing her own horn; that is if the good doctor is really the author. Including her credentials and awards is unnecessary. Stating that she is Governor Sarah Palin’s personal physician is sufficient. Giving too much information is a mistake often made when telling a lie.

The letter immediately focuses on the pregnancies of Sarah Palin. Since pregnancy is not an illness isn’t it odd for that to be the primary focus?

This sentence, “At the time of her most recent pregnancy, Governor Palin had no health risk factors other than her age,” could refer to her pregnancy with Piper. Sarah was 36 when Piper was conceived. Pregnancy after age 35 is considered higher risk.

Then there is this statement. "She followed the normal and recommended schedule for prenatal care, including follow-up perinatology evaluations to ensure there was no significant congenital heart disease or other condition of the baby that would preclude delivery at her home community hospital. This child, Trig, was born at 35 weeks in good health. He was able to go home at two days of age with his mother." Going Rogue, in addition to other sources, revealed that Trig had a hole in his heart. Going Rogue actually says holes, so maybe more than one. Since according to the letter the fetus was evaluated for congenital heart defects, then Sarah was aware of the baby’s condition. Wow! This pro-life saint of a mother who was so concerned about her baby’s well-being hopped on an airplane for the long journey back to Alaska without even being examined just to make sure the baby would be okay? Yes, because the baby was never in Texas.

The letter also reports that at the time of Trig’s last office visit he was growing and developing normally for a child with Trisomy 21. Good to know but what does Trig’s health have to do with the issue this letter is supposed to be addressing? Nothing. That information was included to reiterate that it was safe for Sarah to return to Alaska to deliver Trig since he didn’t suffer any adverse consequences and hopefully mitigate the absurdity of the wild ride.

Another questionable element is this statement. “It is not routine to perform screening tests such as electrocardiograms or liver enzyme panels on young healthy women with no risk factors – and as such I have not performed those tests on Governor Palin.” Sarah Palin, age 44 years and eight months at the time the letter was written would be considered middle-aged. Cholesterol testing is recommended at age 20 or even earlier.

The only non-pregnancy related medical information CBJ gives about Sarah Palin:

  • Her blood pressure and pulse at the time of her last office visit with no mention of when that visit was.
  • She had a breast biopsy in 1992 for what turned out to be a benign lesion.
  • She takes no prescription medications regularly.
  • She has no known drug allergies.

The above is plainly just throwing in a few scraps of Sarah Palin’s medical history to try to legitimize the report.

There is certainly doubt that CBJ even wrote the letter. The inconsistencies were discussed in detail by Audrey. The Palin Deception website is no longer available but the blog is still up. Click here to read Audrey’s post about the letter. Click here for the analysis of the letter mentioned in The Purloined Letter.

Using the public records available from the Alaska DNR Office of the Recorder, I captured screenshots of CBJ’s signature from these records:

Quitclaim Deed 1992
Stat Warranty Deed 1998
Quitclaim Deed 1999

I then made the composite of signatures below with the topmost being the signature from the letter.

cbjsignatures

 

 

I’m sorry that the quality of this graphic isn’t better or if it distorts the page but it was the best I could do using windows paint program. I do believe it shows that the signature in the letter is questionable. I am not a handwriting expert by any means so feel free to express your thoughts as to whether or not the signature on the letter is legitimate. I look forward to everyone’s input.

As always, feel free to make any comments or suggestions about this post or anything related to babygate/ Sarah Palin. Email me with any information you think may be useful. Time is flying by and 2012 will be here before we know it. We have to step up our efforts to insure that Sarah Palin will never be elected POTUS. I may be posting less often as I am spending much of my time researching but I am not going anywhere.

bladecatz@mail.com

Blade

Thursday, September 23, 2010

New Pictures To Discuss

 

I decided to search back further in the Mat-Su Regional Online Nursery pictures. Below is another that I found which reminds me of Trig. This picture is also one that doesn’t appear in the calendar style listings so it took me quite awhile to find this by changing ID numbers. By using the calendar which gives birth dates I was able to date this picture as likely being from late December of 2007 or early January 2008 which fits with the theory that Trig was born around that time.

66298 sarah-palin-note-front-and-back

Does anyone know where and when the picture of Trig on the new release note was taken?

More Evidence That Trig Is Older Than Stated

Here is a picture taken during the 2008 Presidential campaign. Trig couldn’t have been more than six and a half months old if the photo was taken prior to the election but he is waving. Most children don’t wave until around eight months or more. Pretty impressive for a Down Syndrome child to be reaching milestones earlier than non-special needs counterparts.

slide_456_11005_large

Another Picture of Sarah From Fur and Ice March 2008?

I believe this picture is another from Fur and Ice Expo on March 6, 2008. Once again no sign of pregnancy.

icecoatdate 

 

Please feel free to discuss these pictures and email me if you have any additional information.

I may be offline for a day or so as I am switching ISP’s. Don’t worry. I will be back soon.

bladecatz@mail.com

Blade

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Food For Thought

 

I have spent quite a few hours the past couple of days looking through the pictures on the Mat-Su Regional Web Nursery. One thing that I noticed is that the cap Trig is wearing in the picture below is most likely provided by the hospital as there were several babies with the exact same cap.

1trig 68906 

Most of the babies pictured are wearing cute little outfits provided by their families so why was Trig, newborn son of the Governor, photographed in a hospital handout?

I have also often wondered why Trig was burrito wrapped in that striped baby blanket. Are they trying to hide something? I noticed that some babies are only wearing shirts like the ones shown below which are probably hospital issued.

80716  80720

Wanna bet on what Trig’s wearing beneath that blanket?

Moving on, I was looking through my collection of Trig pictures and noticed something that I hadn’t spotted before.

sarah-palin-note-front-and-back

Looking at that halo or whatever that’s supposed to be over Trig’s head, you can plainly see VP. I know Sarah will try to say that it stands for Van Palin but I bet she really meant it to stand for Vice President.

 

More Information About Dr. Robert G. Thompson

I still haven’t been able to find a concrete link between Dr. Thompson and the Palins but I did come across a couple of things I find interesting. The Peninsula Clarion carried this article which I have dated as being from late December 2006, probably the 29th or 30th going by the world and national events reported on the right side of the page – Saddam Hussein’s execution and reference to Gerald Ford’s death.

http://wellness.peninsulaclarion.com/stories/20031221/physicians_1221phy001.shtml

Points I find interesting:

  • Son Nathan is a professional hockey player who is five years older than Track. They may have been acquainted through their mutual sport.
  • Wife Karen has been employed as a flight attendant with Alaska Airlines for over 7 years. It’s likely that she has worked on some of Sarah’s flights considering Sarah’s diverse destinations.
  • He and his wife have been immersed in music their whole lives. Karen is a former US Jazz champion singer and Robert is a concert violinist. They have both concentrated on gospel and praise and worship music. They could have met the Palins at religious gatherings.
  • I found the following in an obituary for Rebecca Atwater from 2005 proving that a Karen and a Robert Thompson lived in Wasilla at that time. I don’t know if they are the Dr. and his wife or totally different people with the same names.

http://www.adn.com/2005/07/29/42750/obituaries.html

None of this information proves anything but it is interesting and shows that it’s very possible that Dr. Thompson or other members of his family could be acquainted with the Palins.

If anyone knows anything regarding the new information I have discovered or has anything to share or discuss, please contact me.

bladecatz@mail.com

Blade

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Short Update Regarding Alaska Permanent Fund

 

A few commenters have posted that Trig and Tripp’s names aren’t on the list for the Alaska Permanent Fund checks. That information is false. The applicant list at http://www.pfd.state.ak.us/applicantinfo/index.aspx which you have to download to your computer and open does list both Trig and Tripp Palin in 2009 and 2010.

I did find something that was interesting. In the 2010 list Tripp’s last name is Johnston-Palin. In 2009, it was just Johnston. So evidently Bristol must have had his name changed. Was that to get back at Levi or did Bristol want both of her sons to have the same last name?

bladecatz@mail.com

Blade

Monday, September 13, 2010

Tripp Who?

 

I have always thought that Bristol and Levi’s son was named Tripp Easton Mitchell Johnston. That was the name that was announced by People and other media outlets. Even the Palin-loving Faux News gives that as the baby’s name.

Excerpt from People article:

The baby's name is Tripp Easton Mitchell Johnston and he was born at 5:30 a.m., according to Jones.
Baby Tripp takes his surname from his dad, Levi Johnston, an apprentice electrician and former Wasilla High School hockey player who has been dating Bristol for three years.

The surname would make sense as Bristol and Levi were supposedly engaged at the time the child was born and Levi openly acknowledged paternity.

But is that really his name? Not according to court records. Here are just a few where the child is referred to as Tripp Johnston-Palin.

http://www.alaskadispatch.com/images/media/files/news/politics/palin_1.pdf

http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0121_bristol_doc_wm.pdf

http://media.adn.com/smedia/2009/12/28/22/Johnston-Butler%20affidavits.44602.source.prod_affiliate.7.pdf

So which name is correct?

I am no lawyer but I have to believe that Tripp Johnston-Palin is correct since the legal name is what would probably be required on court documents.

I can’t find any references to Tripp’s name being changed after Bristol and Levi’s first engagement ended.So why were we led to believe that Tripp’s surname was Johnston?

Was it to make us believe that Bristol and Levi’s relationship was more serious than it really was? Were they really engaged in 2008 or was that as fake as Sarah’s pregnancy? I vote for the latter.

Another interesting fact revealed in this court document is that Tripp receives health coverage from the IHS and Alaska Native Medical Center. Socialized medicine for a Palin? Is Granny freaking over that? Are Todd and all the Palin offspring getting the same coverage? Is it free?

The more I delve into the actions of the Palins the more I realize what hypocritical sleaze balls they really are.

***********

Thanks to all who have emailed me with tips and suggestions. Keep them coming. We are uncovering the lies and half-truths slowly but surely.

bladecatz@mail.com

Blade

Friday, September 10, 2010

Double, Double Toil And Trouble

 

I had never heard of Dr. Gina Loudon, her husband John, or their children until a few days ago when Dr. Gina began her defense of Sarah Palin. So I began to research the Loudon clan who as it turns out are a lot like the Palins who they seem to be trying to emulate.

Like the Palins they are a political family and have five children. One of the children, Samuel, who is adopted, has Down Syndrome.

In a recent Vanity Fair article, reporter Michael Gross mistakenly identified five year old Samuel Loudon as Trig Palin. The mistake is certainly understandable as seen in the photos below. Top, Trig, middle, Samuel, bottom, Trig. There is definitely a resemblance.

    falltrigSamuel_Loudon_with_his_father_John_-_St__Louis_Today_-_Sept__3,_2010Diana_Palin_with_Trig

Samuel’s mother seems to have trouble accepting that a mistake was made. She has been trying to use that mistake to discredit the whole article. However, Gina Loudon has something besides politics and five kids including one with Down Syndrome in common with Sarah. Like Sarah, Gina Loudon lies.

Why is Gina Loudon defending Sarah Palin with such ferocity? Why is she telling lies in an effort to make Michael Gross look bad? Could it be that Michael Gross inadvertently revealed something that the Palins and the Loudons didn’t want revealed?

Here is a picture of Trig that has always bothered me because something about him doesn’t look right. He is slimmer than he appears in other pictures, his face is thinner and his neck seems a lot smaller.

sarah-marvelous-eyes-trig

At least two pro- Palin blogs, here and here present the photo above as Trig. I haven’t seen that identification disputed anywhere.

Now take a good luck at the following image.

 

4957461445_e0e603e78d_z

The little boy is identified as Sam Loudon.

I think the child with the Palins is Sam Loudon. Notice Sam’s face is thin and his neck is small like the boy in the first picture.

Is it possible that the Palins borrow Sam on occasion as a Trig double. But for what reason? Why would Trig be unavailable to his parents?

Another oddity is that according to the Vanity Fair piece, Piper was pushing five year old Sam in a baby carriage. Why would a five year old be in a baby carriage or even a stroller? Sam can walk as seen in this video.

Gina Loudon talks about how close the Palins are to Sam and how Piper spends so much time with him. Sounds like they almost have a brother/sister relationship. Hmmm…Interesting.

If anyone has seen other pictures where Samuel might have been playing Trig or if you have any additional info on the Loudons, please email me.

bladecatz@mail.com

Blade